> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-g2-list@rt.com [mailto:owner-g2-list@rt.com]On Behalf Of
> Hugh O'Neil
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 1999 2:19 AM
> To: Mordekai; g2-list@pbm.com
> Subject: Re: extra lists
>
>
>
> I have to disagree with you on this, personally I think there should
> not be any lists at all, after all how would you know where you stood
> in the world numbers wise without these lists. Unless you had a good
> spy network you would not know how powerful you were comapred to the
> rest of the world. I know it's nice to know these things but I think
> the game would be better if people had to find these things out for
> themselves.
>
> --- Mordekai <apenney@lpr.com.au> wrote:
> >
> > > And no I'm not No1 in hexes visited.
> > > Hexes conquered on the other hand ...
> >
> > I've always thought the lists could be exapanded. I
> > mean number of
> > men is pretty useless as half your manpower is
> > usually stuck in
> > garrisons.
> >
> > Provinces ruled in OK but as it counts for everyone
> > in the pledge
> > chain it is more an alliance measure and hard to
> > work out at that.
> > Maybe all the alliances could send their ranking in.
> > I'm 175th but I
> > have no idea how many actual nations are above or
> > below me.
> >
> > I really want a garrisons destroyed count but that's
> > just me :-)
> >
> > Maximum uses of transcend death would be good
> >
> > Number of factions nobles killed would be good so
> > the ICLF and the
> > BORG could have a competition.
> >
> > Ships sunk definitely
> >
> > Money made from trading for those mercantile types
> >
> > Mordekai
> >
> >
> > PS you are showing your age Minne hexes?? I thought
> > you were all
> > children of the internet age?? Don;t tell me you
> > play boardgames??
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>