Re: extra lists

=?iso-8859-1?q?Hugh=20O'Neil?= (hugh_oneil@yahoo.com)
Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:18:47 -0700 (PDT)

I have to disagree with you on this, personally I think there should
not be any lists at all, after all how would you know where you stood
in the world numbers wise without these lists. Unless you had a good
spy network you would not know how powerful you were comapred to the
rest of the world. I know it's nice to know these things but I think
the game would be better if people had to find these things out for
themselves.

--- Mordekai <apenney@lpr.com.au> wrote:
>
> > And no I'm not No1 in hexes visited.
> > Hexes conquered on the other hand ...
>
> I've always thought the lists could be exapanded. I
> mean number of
> men is pretty useless as half your manpower is
> usually stuck in
> garrisons.
>
> Provinces ruled in OK but as it counts for everyone
> in the pledge
> chain it is more an alliance measure and hard to
> work out at that.
> Maybe all the alliances could send their ranking in.
> I'm 175th but I
> have no idea how many actual nations are above or
> below me.
>
> I really want a garrisons destroyed count but that's
> just me :-)
>
> Maximum uses of transcend death would be good
>
> Number of factions nobles killed would be good so
> the ICLF and the
> BORG could have a competition.
>
> Ships sunk definitely
>
> Money made from trading for those mercantile types
>
> Mordekai
>
>
> PS you are showing your age Minne hexes?? I thought
> you were all
> children of the internet age?? Don;t tell me you
> play boardgames??
>

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links