Re: Castle Ownership

Ken Scott (ken.scott@pobox.com)
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:10:47 -0700

Yes you have to have a noble permanently there, but it's not as bad as you
sound. That noble can make weapons, breed beasts, or train elite fighters
and knights. You'll have plenty of things to take up his 30 days a month.

At 11:37 AM 10/12/98 EDT, Strallen2@aol.com wrote:
>I'm kinda new to the game, I'll be starting tomorrow, and I have a question.
>Mostly I understand alot of the rules, and though I believe I already
>understand the answer to this one, I want to make sure. If you want to build
>and control a Castle, and most of the surrounding area, besides garrisons and
>numerous other things you have to have a Noble permanently residing in the
>castle don't you? Or at least residing there until you replace him/her with a
>different Noble. You have to forever give up one of your Nobles if you
want to
>be able to control the castle, otherwise the next person to come along could
>claim it and the lands garrisoned to it. I was just wondering, to make sure I
>had it right, since even though I might want to eventually control some land
>(if I can find any that isn't already claimed), the idea of having to
>permanently lose a Noble (lose seemed close enough to the same thin for me)
>isn't very appealing.

--

*

o) * *

Order of the Crescent TIB Alliance

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links