Re: Azrain & the Peace Accord

Mike Brand (mbrand@fastlane.net)
Thu, 09 Apr 1998 22:08:08 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Seehawk42: "Re: Azrain & the Peace Accord"
Previous message: Mike Brand: "Re: Azrain & old treaties"

At 04:25 PM 4/9/98 -0400, kicker@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>Eric the Seehawk seems to be under the impression that PLATO has to hide
>behind anything. In that he is sadly mistaken. Further, the Eagle
>Alliance had absolutely nothing to do with our attack on Azrain either
>the first or the second time. They came late to the fight and we never
>directly engaged them in any way. To characterize our conflict as a
>Camaris affair is thoroughly inaccurate. Our beef was with the New
>Empire, a Provinian alliance. The Eagles are an ally of the New Empire
>so they came from Camaris to the New Empire's aid;however, they arrived
>2 turns AFTER PLATO had vacated Provinia. We did not directly attack
>them at any time, so please get your facts right before you make
>accusations.

As does everyone else, I speak only for myself. The New Empire **was**
part of the Eagle Alliance at the time of the Azrain attack and PLATO
clearly knew this. Any battles fought between PLATO and the New Empire was
a battle with the Eagle Alliance.

Get your facts right.

Mike of Jackal

Next message: Seehawk42: "Re: Azrain & the Peace Accord"
Previous message: Mike Brand: "Re: Azrain & old treaties"

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links