> Except that if Rich published statistics, I think that you'll find a
> majority of income comes from trade, not garrisons. Once you run out
> of land, it's fairly expensive to build enough structures to increase
> your income. The game, as it stands, emphasizes trade a bit too much,
> in my opinion. You probably don't agree, but that's OK with me.
As I've said, trade only generates money. Castles and garrisons serve more
purposes. Also, castles and garrisons are easier to mantain. That why I think it
all balances out.
Everyone as the right to their opinion, and in fact I am curious as to other
peoples opinions on this. So far only the two of us (okay, someone else said
something) have been discussing the issue.
Best Regards,
--
Rogerio