Re: Major alliances controlling several starting cities?!

Mordekai (apenney@lpr.com.au)
Tue, 7 Sep 1999 21:34:07 +1000

If this was RL and you were in Australia the BoRG would be sueing you
right now for "Restraint of Trade".

In fact in America we would file an anti-trust suit. You try being a
mercenary when there are really only three sides and one side doesn't
hire mercenaries.

The BoRG need some more and varied wars so we can:

1) stop playing tag with the Lords which is becoming slightly boring
(and terminal)

2) drive our prices up a bit. (We ARE just traders, only we trade in
death and chaos)

3) see some new terrain becuase we have fought and killed and died
over almost every province around Harn and the weather here for one
is terrible and the food is worse.

Mordekai

> I suggest you duck for cover and/or join the more peaceful alliances
> such as T.I.B.S. or the House of Lords. I also suggest that unless
> there is a massive drop out of one alliance or the other, neither of
> these two alliances are going to be AOOish anytime soon. Heck, it may
> even be in everyone else's best interest to see this was continue ad
> infinitum. Pick the side that seems to be losing and send it aid or
> new members so as to keep it going. So long as it is going, WARriors
> have some place they can go if they want to get into a fight without
> starting a war on some other peaceful area of the Olympian world.

Mordekai
Marshal
Brotherhood of the Red God

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links