Re: Crown attacks on Neutrals

R. W. Gabriel (silas75@hotmail.com)
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 03:19:44 GMT

Actually Maltar I believe you have it ass backwards. Eric said that people
who know about warzones and venture into those zones take full
responsibility for their death.

If a person walks into a fire and gets burned, is it the fire's fault?

>From: Humakt2@aol.com
>To: g2-list@pbm.com
>Subject: Re: Crown attacks on Neutrals
>Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 00:33:41 EDT
>
>
>So Seehawk and these others basically believe that the guy with the army
>can
>attack whoever he wants, and the other nobles in the area should notify the
>general of their neutrality and beg his leave not to be attacked.
>
>Quite simply, this is ass backwards. Generals are supposed to scout their
>enemies and sort combatants from neutrals.
>
>However, if that is the Olympia consensus, I am happy to live by it. As a
>guy with a lot of troops to throw around, this will make my life easy very
>often.
>
>Maltar

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links