Hugh O'Neil wrote:
>
> I see what you are saying, it's perfectly ok to kill everyone and
> anyone within the area of the warzone because if they aint my friend
> they must be my enemy. Hurrah ethnic cleansing comes to olympia
>
> --- Seehawk42@aol.com wrote:
> > In a message dated 99-08-14 20:45:46 EDT,
> > Humakt2@aol.com writes:
> >
> > > So Seehawk and these others basically believe that
> > the guy with the army
> > can
> > >
> > > attack whoever he wants, and the other nobles in
> > the area should notify
> > the
> > > general of their neutrality and beg his leave not
> > to be attacked.
> > >
> >
> > add to the above statement the phrase "in a known
> > and public war zone"... as
> > in....."An army will attack all perceived threats in
> > a known and puble
> > warzone. It is everybody's responsibility to take
> > reasonable steps to enusre
> > their own safety"
> >
> > As I mentioned before, this is not a matter of a
> > sneak attack or a small
> > scale skirmish. Everybody in this game has known
> > about the war, it's
> > location and it's combatents for 25+ turns. It's a
> > simply matter of self
> > preseravation. If you're in or near a known war
> > zone then it's only prudent
> > to inform the combatants of your presence. Why do
> > you think I asked TIB MoFA
> > to inform you of my stack south of Greyfell? I
> > didn't want you to think I
> > was NoE. I realized that I was getting close to the
> > fighting and didn't want
> > to be chalked up to collateral damage so I took
> > precautions.
> >
> > This also still begs the question that if these
> > factions were neutral, why do
> > you speak for them?
> >
> > Eric the Seehawk,
> > just another faction, not a Minister of Foreign
> > Affairs or anything....
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com