As I remember it, I went a long ways out of my way to try to find a way
to agree with you and your allies on many issues early in G2.
Eventually, we did manage to find common ground and made several
agreements on borders and land use. The principle issue we managed to
agree on involved finding you some land to settle. Evidently, your
allies couldn't spare enough of eastern Camaris to make room for you.
Now I bet we can agree that those agreements have been broken. Right?
What do you know, we've agreed again!
I also know, KING Oleg, that the ultimate failure of those agreements
was not the fault of the Dragons, although I doubt you would agree with
me on that point.
I also think it's really interesting that your reply to my post does not
attempt to rebut the points I made. You have not attempted to show why
you should be able to express outrage that the terms of a treaty might
have been overlooked. Nor have you attempted to argue why the movement
of LoTC forces through CD territory is an example of a violation of a
policy by the CD's that closes their borders. Instead the only thing you
can find to do is to take acouple cheap shots. Guess you concede that
you have no right to take the moral high ground and that your example
wasn't internally consistent. What! Two more instances of agreement!
Will wonders never cease?
Terry Hoffman
Greg Lindahl wrote:
>
> > Second, your example of an instance of the CD's colsed border policy
> > being violated doesn't seem internally consistent to me.
>
> You're surprised that we don't agree about something? Dang. I'd be
> surprised if we agreed about anything.
>
> > Terry Hoffman
>
> You have a character in the game named Terry Hoffman? Weird.
>
> -- King Oleg the Deadhead