Re: Re: Ergoth Attack on Annuin/Port Royal

MarcElmo@aol.com
Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:23:31 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: dsr_ft@dansk-sygeplejeraad.dk: "Some observations about facts mentioned (ad. Annuin war)"
Previous message: Ian Sparks: "Churn rate..."
Maybe in reply to: James Frediani: "Re: Ergoth Attack on Annuin/Port Royal"
Next in thread: R. W. Gabriel: "Re: Re: Ergoth Attack on Annuin/Port Royal"

This may be the least correct statement ever made on the g2-list. Dislike the
Musketeers if you like, rail against us as you will, but there is no
objective way that any group can be MORE democratic than the Musketeers.
We pride ourselves on a 'All for one, one for all' mentality. In that simple
statement is the sum total of democracy; everyone has a voice in any decision
making process, and all members are encouraged to participate in events and
planning, from the greenest newbie to the most veteran player. Even those
whose only motives are deceit and betrayal.
Your anti-Musketeer propaganda is starting to border on slander. Thankfully,
Silas took the cowardly way out and dropped, else the rest of us would have
some traitor carcasses to avoid marching over.
Wolfpack

In a message dated 7/27/99, 7:06:56 AM, silas75@hotmail.com writes:
<<Actually I believe I equated democracy with tolerance and a lack of need to
play word games with politics to convince others of my "rightness" and
naother's "badness". The LOTC aren't the best democracy or the only. They
simply are more democratic than the musketeers.>>

Next message: dsr_ft@dansk-sygeplejeraad.dk: "Some observations about facts mentioned (ad. Annuin war)"
Previous message: Ian Sparks: "Churn rate..."
Maybe in reply to: James Frediani: "Re: Ergoth Attack on Annuin/Port Royal"
Next in thread: R. W. Gabriel: "Re: Re: Ergoth Attack on Annuin/Port Royal"

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links