Re: Aura Blast protection

Seehawk42@aol.com
Thu, 22 Apr 1999 15:23:11 EDT

In a message dated 4/22/99 2:49:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
mrwayne@mindspring.com writes:

> Rich has said that he will not make any major changes to the game. Adding a
> way to avoid AuraBlast would be a major change in the game. I do think
that
> the current system does suck, but we should wait for G3 before any changes
> are made.
>

My advocation of a rules change will not make it so. Heck, I can't get the
moderator to pay attention to my notes about bugs, why would he change the
rules for me? :-)

I understand the mind-set of not wanting to change rules that would
negatively affect you. TIB has our fair share of necromancers too and we
would be negatively affected by any change to their relative power also. In
these situations I try to look past how a proposed rule change would
specifically affect my position or the position of my allies and instead try
to reflect on what would be best for the game as a whole.

In the end no rules will be changed...I'm just waxing about a perfect world.
I think the Aurablast spell, and all the permutations and connections to it,
are unbalanced. I don't think there's any harm in saying that, and I think
most people would agree.

Eric the Seehawk

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links