>Actually you're both incorrect.
>The command line states TARGET (everything which has an ID)
>The explanation says it has to be a character.
>A character you pay a NP for.
>A garrison you don't.
>
>that's the difference.
>
>Yves.
>
>PS: If I where the one who's garrison is blasted (and it worked)
> I would ask compensation from Rich.
>
>Next you'll say you can blast buildings.
>Maybe a protection from Blasts/Necromantics is in order.
>
>
Congratulations, Yves. You've hit my concern right on the head.
Well, close to it. As one can Lightning blast structures outside cities,
I am less concerned with the ability to AB them. But I think everyone
all all sides should be _VERY_ concerned that aura blasts could take
out structures _inside_ cities. If that is possible, kiss all reason
for having castles at all goodbye. They go from being nearly unasailable
to undefendable targets [g1 to g2].
As for compensation...really? I don't recall anyone getting their
Aurablasted nobles back when the SFW bug was working. And I disagree that
this is a bug. Or a feature. I believe it was designed to work that
way. But that is _my_ opinion. You'd have to ask Rich to see if I'm
correct or not.
ICLF