Rich if your listening, PLEASE, PLEASE find some time to fix this. I
know changes can introduce problems but I can think of few worse than
this. It eliminates the movement slow downs put into the combat system
completely.
What is even more scary is, that I probably don't completely understand
how this works and its already terrifying to me.
Basil
"P.J.M. Beerepoot" wrote:
>
> I am only a bystander looking at this correspondence with a lot of
> amusement. I aint biased so in a way Greg is right. It is a feature, however
> i doubt the feature was intended that way, which makes it a feature-bug. You
> havent figured it out yet.......tutututtut its in the priority codes.
> Should i say more? So i believe greg when he says he found out about it 6
> months ago and reported it. It isnt all that hard to find is it when you
> look for it...and about that particular aspect i keep my opnion to myself.
>
> Peter
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: DScoledge@aol.com <DScoledge@aol.com>
> Aan: g2-list@pbm.com <g2-list@pbm.com>
> Datum: woensdag 24 maart 1999 20:38
> Onderwerp: Re: The Good Old Days ...
>
> >In a message dated 3/24/99 11:12:09 AM Pacific Standard Time, bron-
> >oly2@bronze.corp.sgi.com writes:
> >
> >> My own attitude is that when you uncover a bug, it needs to
> >> be reported to Rich. However, once you have done your duty
> >> and reported the bug, it should now be considered a "feature"
> >> (by virtue of its being documented) and thus fair game to
> >> use. The flip side is that when it gets fixed without warning,
> >> you don't get to complain about *that* either.
> >
> > That would be good if there was an "Official BUG List".
> >
> > But there isn't.
> >
> > So I believe that their duty as a member of Olympia that wants to see the
> >game flourish, is to let EVERYONE know about it before you can consider it
> a
> >"feature".
> >
> > And who hired the Clinton Lawyers to come up with this word "feature" to
> >describe BUGs?
> >
> > Charlotte
> >