Re: Hostile all ??

Basil A. Daoust (daoust@ibm.net)
Fri, 05 Mar 1999 12:07:04 -0600

I know that DEFEND faction_id works
so why would we think that HOSTILE faction_id would not?

HOSTILE ALL <--- hell I would use this to control savages if it worked
along with default faction_id (of course).

Basil

Bron Nelson wrote:
>
> > HOSTILE ALL has always worked, I thought, g1 and g2.
>
> Not to my knowledge, no. Have you, or has anyone, actually
> used HOSTILE ALL and observed its effects?
>
> Note that in the rules, ADMIT is the only order shown to allow
> the ALL qualifier (ACCEPT also sort of does by using "0" instead
> of "all"). The description for HOSTILE is silent on the issue
> of whether it is legal to use ALL. Admittedly, the HOSTILE
> description does explicitely say that HOSTILE faction_id *does*
> work, which I believe is incorrect, so the fact that ALL is not
> discussed is not a proof one way or the other.
>
> Anyway .. it is my belief that neither HOSTILE ALL nor HOSTILE faction_id
> have any effect; does anyone have direct experiance with this either way?
>
> --
> Please use bron-oly2@bronze.corp.sgi.com for Oly2 correspondence.
> Use bron@sgi.com only if you require fast response.
> These statements are my own, not those of Silicon Graphics.

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links