Just because every one of us has not figured it out yet doesn't make
the fact any less likely. It is likely that we get into ruts that work
for us and we keep doing the same things over and over again.
Basil
Greg Lindahl wrote:
>
> > Rather than continuing to debate the real or imaginary nature of
> > this offshoot of the original topic, I suggest that Skip email
> > Rich privately with the details of the method he "discovered"
>
> I bet Skip probably has already -- after all, most of us believe
> strongly that bugs should be reported. However, given Skip's
> explanation style, it's not clear that there is any bug, or that Skip
> will successfully explain it to Rich. This is why I am attempting to
> get Skip to explain more, to see if there is a real bug or not.
>
> > And if this is something that he deduced, perhaps incorrectly
> > [ie: hasn't actually seen it done], I hope he has the good grace
> > to tell us what he _thought_ it was if Rich tells him that this
> > non-NPC method does not, in fact, work.
>
> History tells us that Rich is unlikely to reply to the bug report, bug
> or no bug, fixed or not.
>
> -- greg