> What is the sense of that? I see now where that is shown in one of the
> examples in the rules but it's a damned poor example and easy to miss. This
> bi-product should be pointed out more if not eliminated. I personally would
> rather see it eliminated. Is there a list of what should be changed in G3 or
> was that just talk?
> Mike Moore
It's mainly useful to guarantee that a certain noble becomes the owner of
a location after the current owner has left. I think it should stay as there's
no other way to get the same effect.
Tim