<< MMoore2070@aol.com wrote:
> I think the promote order is broken. I used it to promote a man farther
down
> in a stack, who incidentally had all the money; and it dropped him from the
> stack instead. The results:
> 30: Maintenance costs are 115 gold, can afford 0 gold.
> 30: Three peasants starved.
> 30: Ten crossbowmen left service.
> 30: Five elite archers left service
>
> Michael Moore
Promote moves a noble below you to just above you in the location
but you would have to stack under him after promoting him to keep
the stack together.
>>
What is the sense of that? I see now where that is shown in one of the
examples in the rules but it's a damned poor example and easy to miss. This
bi-product should be pointed out more if not eliminated. I personally would
rather see it eliminated. Is there a list of what should be changed in G3 or
was that just talk?
Mike Moore