Re: Bounty offered

Seehawk42@aol.com
Mon, 29 Jun 1998 13:09:49 EDT

In a message dated 98-06-29 11:04:24 EDT, rrodgers@unex.ucla.edu writes:

> Really, only one comment here:
>
> Cendage, what the HELL business is this of yours? The fact that that
> what you say is completely innacurate is almost irrelevant. What is
> more troubling in this game is that certain loudmouths have such an
> advanced opinion of themselves that they feel it is their right and duty
> to spew about matters on which they have no interest or knowledge.
>
> From now on, let's make a rule that if you have no facts on which to
> base your mindless nattering that you just keep it to yourself.
>
> Ming, the Irritated
>

Ming,
unless Stahl and Stein is a member of Plato, then it seems that your
involvement in the discussion is just as misplaced as Cendage's is.

And if Stahl and Stein IS a member of Plato, thus justifiying your
involvement, then Cendage's assertion is correct and your statement (calling
his inaccurate) is actually false.

So which is it? Are you "spewing about matters about which you have no
interest or knowledge"? (to paraphrase you)
or are you simply not telling the truth about Stahl and Stein's connection to
Plato?

Ugmot the Beast
Lord of Hammerhill

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links