Re: Mercenaries Wanted

James Frediani (ferpo@netdex.com)
Tue, 5 May 1998 22:52:15 -0700

-----Original Message-----
From: jdgbobr@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu <jdgbobr@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu>
To: James Frediani <ferpo@netdex.com>
Cc: Mark Hendrickson <mrhendri@sprintmail.com>; Mike Brand
<mbrand@fastlane.net>; Bruce Glassco <esglasb@es.cc.va.us>; g2-list@pbm.com
<g2-list@pbm.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 05, 1998 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Mercenaries Wanted

>
>
>> Dear Jackel:
>
>I'll answer this if Jackal doesn't mind.
>
>> Point of order. All this talk of Treaties and Accords, I want to make
>> sure that I understand correctly. Harn and LotC withdrew from a Treaty
>> between the two of them? Or are you using the word "Treaty" inter-
>> changably with "Accord"? The clarification I desire is whether or not
>> the Treaty was part of the Accor, or a separate issue entirely.
>
>The Accord == Treaty. Same thing.
>
>> If the Harn/LotC border was part of the Accord, both sides seem to have
>> chosen to discard said Accord.
>
>They weren't part of the Accord. One or both played the "silent game" when
>asked to participate.
>
>Now, what *was* part of the infamous Accord was a split of New Empire land
>between LotC and Inner Circle. Rescinding this part of the Accord would
>make a certain alliance very angry.
>
>
>--Cendage
>Eridanus
>
>

Thank you for the clarification.

My understanding is that if the IC or the LotC conducts military opera-
tions in the other's territory [raids, quests, attacks, claim jumping]
then the Accord is violated and the Eagle Alliance will attack whichever
side broke the Accord first.

Now, does this prevent the IC and PLATO from fighting the Lords of the
Crown in HARN Confederacy Territory? Perhaps you would care to con-
sider those as separate issues, one for IC, one for PLATO, as it appears
the _spirit_ of the Accord was to keep _outside_ alliances from fighting on
Provinnia.

Jim Frediani

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links