Mike Brand wrote:
> I notice that you have not chosen to refute my claims that the Yellowleaf
> Accord has been violated by PLATO and the IC. I am forced to assume that
> the Accord has been violated unless I hear otherwise.
Well, that's stupid. If I don't answer you it's probably because what
you wrote warranted no reply.
To the best of my knowledge, Plato has not violated the Yellowleaf
treaty & does not intend to.
> Additionally it is my understanding that both Harn and the LotC wish to
> address their conflict between themselves without outside interference. I
> have great respect for this wish and will do what I can to help uphold it.
Have a care here matey. I have no evidence that what you say is true.
Indeed, this is the first I have heard of it. But if you wish for us to
"mind our own business," then I might ask the same of you.
Let me include a note sent to me by a noble totally unknown to me, but
in any event, rather astute. Looking over the Yellowleaf treaty he
found this:
begin quote:
"7) Plato and Camaris based Eagle Alliance cells will remove
all nobles from the continent of Provinia by the start of turn 55.
"Done. At the start of turn 55 you were clear of Provinia. It is not
turn
55, so this restriction has expired.
"8) The Camaris non-agression pact will be amended to include
the continent of Provinia
"I take this to mean that Camaris factions aren't to fight each other on
Provinia. LotC is on Provinia, not Camaris, so this restriction does not
apply."
end quote.
very astute.
best,
Captain Arrr