My appologies for misnaming you. Both the original message and the message
sent to my neighbor encouraging them to attack me apparently had the
mistaken name "Mark" attached to the header.
I notice that you have not chosen to refute my claims that the Yellowleaf
Accord has been violated by PLATO and the IC. I am forced to assume that
the Accord has been violated unless I hear otherwise.
I will add a third point. My recollection (I can't find the final copy)
was that Harn and the LotC chose to withdraw from the treaty. The result
was the ghazi announced by a Harn faction. I've heard no mention of the
LotC seizing land by force after the Accord was signed but before they
launched their counter-attack. If this is in error I would like to know.
Additionally it is my understanding that both Harn and the LotC wish to
address their conflict between themselves without outside interference. I
have great respect for this wish and will do what I can to help uphold it.
I welcome any response to either the above statements or to the two
citations of violations of the Yellowleaf Accord stated in my previous
post. These (and appologies for inaccuracies) are the only issues I'm
interested in discussing reguarding Accord.
Mike Brand
Jackal Alliance
At 06:41 AM 5/4/98 -0500, Mark Hendrickson wrote:
>Greetings all:
>
>Mike Brand wrote:
>
>> I believe that you misread the author of the original message. I am the
>> Jackal, not the Ghost.
>
>Ooops. Well, it still stands, except that sour grapes stuff.
>
>> I have no interest in debating this matter.
>
>uh huh.
>
>> I am not aware of any violation of the Yellowleaf Accord made by the LotC.
>
>Well that's too bad, since that's how this whole thing got started. The
>LotC agreed & then violated the border agreements with the IC & HARN.
>That HARN responded with violence is IMHO totally approrpiate. They
>they've been criticized for this is shameful. All this has been
>outlined on the G-2 list & in the Times.
>
>> On a final note, Mark
>
>Who's that? I have heard it said that a certain "Mark," the existence
>of whom I can in no way verify, controlls my actions. I say only that
>Captain Arrr is not beholden to any "Mark" but to my master, who is
>indeed a great noble, & a Count too. This untitled "Mark" sounds like
>the figment of a deranged imagination.
>
>I am,
>Best wishes,
>Captain Arrr
>Servant to the great Count
>Friend of the Great King
>
>