Re: Azrain & old treaties

Keith Hearn (khearn@pyramid.com)
Tue, 07 Apr 1998 20:45:00 -0700

Mark Hendrickson wrote:
>
> Greetings nobles:
>
> Oh yea, one more thing. The LoC, operating out of the Fence, has
> declared Azrain a closed city, violating the peace treaty.
>
> I am,
> not amused,
> -Captain Arrr

Hmmm, doesn't sound good, but then, I have little idea what the
Captain is talking about. Yes, I know what treaty he means, and
I know who the LoC is, but I haven't heard anyone (else) say
that Azrain is a closed city.

Care to give us a few more details, Captain? I'm not saying I
don't believe you, I'd just like to base my opinion on more
than just hearsay.

Andrew Grey,
Not Speaking for the RoSC,
not Speaking for Eagle,
just speaking for The Grey Company.

p.s. We're still not half destroyed by the SA, not even scratched.
I guess they're too busy acting like 12 year olds to bother
following up on their challenge. Let's see, they said that
within 5 turns they'd destroy half of any faction that
responded to the challenge. I responded on turn 57. I guess
they have until turn 62.

They'd better quit planning fun runs and making juvenile insults
on the g2-list and get going. I suspect this recent change in
personality is due to them realising the difficulty of actually
doing what they claimed to be able to do (probably didn't expect
anyone to call their bluff), so they claim that Lord Angelo has
been deposed, and then they can try to say that they don't have
to follow up on his challenge. What a bunch of weenies. Or should
I simply make that singular, since I doubt there's more than one
player in the SA.

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links