Re: List revelence? (Was: RE: Blood/Sweat and Tears?)

Jim O'Brien (jjobrien@erols.com)
Tue, 7 Apr 1998 20:49:35 -0400 (EDT)

At 03:34 PM 4/7/98 -0700, Jeff Heinen wrote:

>Really? That's odd. I had always beleive these types of posts were revelent
>in the g2-list. The g2-list had always been that, a list of
>Announcements/Role-Play/Discussion about all things G2.
>
>Now, you could argue that the Role-playing aspects should stay in the
>Times. Unfortunally, I don't beleive you could contain it there even if you
>wanted it. There are times you want to start and discuss for next turn.
>Speed is a very important aspect when your planning turns. If the "Open
>Appeal for Peace" and the discussion that followed it had stayed only in
>the times, it would still be going on. Or perhaps not as the war planning
>could not have slowed enough to keep the communication lines open.
>
>Funny thing is, I always beleived that the "long winded discussions of
>obscure rule points" was more of a design issue and should be in the design
>list.
>
>'Course, thats for the listmoms to decide.
>
>-Jeff

You can argue about what should & shouldn't be allowed on this list all day
long, but spam is spam, and nobody should want to see it here. I agree with
everything you wrote in your message, but none of it has much to do with the
bulk of the posts that the SA has recently been subjecting us to. They are
neither announcements, role-playing, nor game discussions. They're just
plain old spam.

Shadowalliance@hotmail.com is the newest entry to my killfile.

'nuff said.

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links