re:RE: FYI

CHRIS BUTCHKO (cbutchko@cftc.gov)
Mon, 2 Feb 98 21:50:22 PST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: jdgbobr@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu: "Eagle Apology to Inner Circle"
Previous message: Mark Hendrickson: "Trading history for fun"

Sent by:Colin <C.I.Cavanagh@qmw.ac.uk>
"The only way things would be historically correct would be for the
castle holders to have some contrrol on the trade in their holdings at
the moment there is none you can control all the cities but unles you
prevent others trading in themn and you trade instead of them then you
will only reap the taxes of your people, which is never enough."
***
Okay, what if the tradegoods command could only be issued by the owner of
the castle in the city; or
What if the tradegoods command issued by the holder of the castle in the
city had a 50% chance of working, but when issued by any ordinary joe it
was only 10%?
What if every successful use of rare tradegoods finding/markets was
reflected by an above-the-press report in the _Times_? Scary, huh?
-RCB

Next message: jdgbobr@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu: "Eagle Apology to Inner Circle"
Previous message: Mark Hendrickson: "Trading history for fun"

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links