> Which proves my point quite well -- even if Rich reserves the right to
> change a game to preserve balance, some players will whine too much
> for him to do it. Oh well.
>
> Now why did we have to exchange so many pieces of mail to make my
> original point?
I like contructive discussion. Anyway, did you have any certainty at the time in
g1 when the changes you proposed were good enough not to unbalance the game the other
way around later on?
> Given that BSE had a lot of GM discression, it doesn't make a good
It had a lot of gm discression, but not in rules changes.
> (once the GTT THC in the USA BSE game... dropped out in... er, 1984.)
I didn't play the american game, I played the KJC one. The game was screwed up from
the start, that is correct.
GTT I should've known 8-)
Best Regards,
Rogerio