If Rich is the only one who does any changes, then the game of Olympia will
die when Rich become disinterested in it. Right now, several players are
suggesting ideas they've had, and I'm sure Rich is reading them, and
watching what the rest of our responses are.
It's fine to say that Rich will implement any changes that are needed, but
there may be a change that he doesn't think needed, but that is called for
by many players. In this case voting would be the most likely avenue.
A voting system would be very easy. It could be turned in as part of your
turn orders. Something like this would ensure anonymity and would note
interfere with the game.
By the way, I don't think there has been anything yet that has reached the
need of voting.
At 10:37 AM 8/30/97 +0100, RASMUS.ENGBERG@UK.DMG.deuba.com wrote:
>...I have to agree that voting on rules has to be the worst suggestion so far
>
>one more thing: We the players of Olympia, must take responsibilty for making
>the Olympia Times a better and more interesting product to read. Clean out
most
>the ads and start reporting or spreading rumors about what is actually
going on
>in G2!
-- ________________________ Ken ScottStudent Technology Support Academic Computing and Technology Services Murray State Univerity Murray, KY