If there are 200+ players in Game 2, then why don't we just have a vote on
any changes to the game. It should be very hard to get a rule change to
pass, 3/4 of the players, but if we continually enchance Game 2, we may
never need a Game 3.
>I disagree. G1 would have been a much more interesting game had a few
>more changes been made in mid-stream. There were significant changes
>made to G1, such as outlawing speed-cast of trance, and reducing the
>value of orbs and control items. These were all necessary changes in a
>game which is attempting to run for a long time.
>