On Wed, 16 Apr 1997, Bruce Glassco wrote:
> At 07:28 AM 4/16/97 -0600, you wrote:
> >At 10:55 +0000 4/16/97, Fox wrote:
>
> I agree that the inconvenience seems minor compared to the alternative.
> However, I don't see any reason why the ACCEPT command shouldn't be like
> HOSTILE, DEFEND, and other attitude commands, in lasting until it gets
> turned off, instead of being renewed every turn.
>
> bg
>
>