Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?
Jay Gischer (gischer@puget.mti.sgi.com)
Tue, 23 Aug 94 22:12:11 -0700
DAZCapn@aol.com writes:
> Rich;
>
> Oh, I dunno. _Some_ trash & slander is okay (grin). Although I agree with
> the assertion that attacking Greg L. personally was WAY out of line (repeat
> after me: It's only a game...it's only a game...it's only a game...)
>
> Maybe you should make it a point to ID player posts as specifically that, and
> give people the option of either identifying themselves (by faction or
> player) or making "ANON" posts.
>
> I think the latter will have MUCH less credibility...
>
> Tony Baldacci
>
To me any unsigned message in the Times lacks credibility. I'd hate
to see the anonymous stuff go away. But the only solution I can think
of is censorship by our friendly GM. Ugh.
-j
Main Index
|
Olympia
|
Arena
|
PBM FAQ
|
Links