I would theorize that the reason diplomatic pundits dispise Cendage so much
is b/c his diplomatic skills far exceed their own. Of course I could be
wrong, but I find it oh so amusing that cendage is blamed for subversive
wrongdoing that the complainers are incapable of stopping (read:
incompetence).
Oh yeah, the Ergothian manifesto that provoked a terse history lesson from
greg (as theoretically ignorant as the lesson was) echoes in great part the
musketeer arguments for attacking the LOTC. At the time of the Great
Musketeer Blustering (GMB), I could have sworn I was going to vomit; I could
only stand so much talk about oppression, freedom, death and glory.
obviously the musketeers have to resort to animated sword waving b/c their
diplomatic intuition is lacking.
In the meantime, I congratulate the Musketeers on another diplomatic mishap.
It's nice to know that power and incompetence within the musketeer hierarchy
are still bound together.
>From: ----- <jdgbobr@io.com>
>To: James Frediani <ferpo@netdex.com>
>CC: g2-list@pbm.com
>Subject: Re: Ergoth Attack on Annuin/Port Royal
>Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:52:30 -0500 (CDT)
>
>
>
>On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, James Frediani wrote:
>
> > this "faction" was under the influence of the Lords, Cendege [as
> > was Silas] or Mickey Mao [man-in-the-moon marigolds?].
>
>That's Cend_a_ge to you, pally.
>
>Fear me! I am involved in everything mishap conceivable in Olympia! I am
>involved in every castle capture and every aura blast and every research
>flop! My network is vast! My nobles are everywhere! (I started on turn
>-120, so you can see the noble points I accumulated before anyone else
>even started.)
>
>*yawn*
>
>--jon
>
>
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com