There has definitely been tampered with the code, since before when an
aurablast failed the farcast was gone !! Now, the farcast is still there !
So changes have been made by the GM.
Domme
----- Original Message -----
From: James Frediani <ferpo@netdex.com>
To: Basil A. Daoust <daoust@ibm.net>; Mordekai <apenney@lpr.com.au>
Cc: <g2-list@pbm.com>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 1999 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: Aura Blast Bug
>
> >I don't think the problem is with farcast since a spell casted after my
> >failed aurablast was done in the target location instead of the
> >aurablast :-(
> >
> >Basil
> >
> >
>
>
> Are all the target nobles using 641 1, even though they are not alone?
> This was, I am told, an error a very long time ago. It was corrected.
> Maybe a more recent bug-fix undid this correction?
>
>
> Realize that I _am_ grasping for straws here. I've never even done
> a farcast, let alone an aura blast in g1 or g2.
>
>
> Frankly, your alliance with its face-to-face council meetings is probably
> best suited to do a systematic check, trying to eliminate what does and
> what does _not_ work.
>
>
> I once saw in another PBeM game where a computer went down and the
> Moderators up-loaded an obsolete program before they uploaded the last
> "saved" back-up of game data. That one was real obvious _really_ fast.
> I don't know if Rich does back-ups or if the system went down or not.
> I'm just saying that all sorts of things can happen.
>
>
> Jim
>
>
>
>
>
>