Basil
James Frediani wrote:
>
> It is not a bug or a feature. For someone who has criticised
> people for reading the Lore Sheets instead of the rules, I find your
> complaint to be more along the lines of "you are evil because I didn't
> think of it first". Learn to read. I am not responsible that the RULES
> don't mean what you ASSUMED them to mean.
>
> And as the rules clearly state that all beasts have a % chance of
> dying each turn, I guess all those people who have been storing their
> Beasts in garrisons so that CONTRARY to the RULES they do not die,
> now have to fear that they may lose them afterall.
>
> You see, the reason why garrisons don't have any way to avoid ABs
> is quite simple. The designer thought of garrisons as someplace
> one had 10 soldiers or peasants. Who would waste ?50? aura blasting
> 10 soldiers or peasants? No one. He obviously didn't realize that
> players [on all sides] would use garrisons to countervene the Beast
> dying/undead rotting/ghost warrior dissolving rules. So...you've made
> your garrisons targets worthy of consideration.
>
> I have one concern with this, and that I expressed to Rich.
>
> Meanwhile, I find it amusing you are complaining that people are
> using the rules to counter your attempt to go around them. And
> AMAZING that you would be foolish enough to open yourself up
> as a target by "blasting" someone who is using the rules
> AS WRITTEN to counter your use of a bug/feature.
>
> BTW...I have no idea who actually did this...I have no Aura Blast
> capable nobles yet. So there is ANOTHER assumption that you made,
> and were WRONG about.
>
> Are you Oleg's illegitimate oftspring we keep hearing rumors about?
> You know, the real reason for the PLATO/LOTC war...Oleg's dalliance
> with Lady E.? ;^)
>
> ICLF
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominick Vansevenant <domme@pandora.be>
> To: James Frediani <ferpo@netdex.com>; Dragon Lord <ssifu@hotmail.com>;
> g2-list@pbm.com <g2-list@pbm.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 5:58 AM
> Subject: Re:
>
> >It is ridiculous you try to defend this abuse of the aurablast spell:
> >
> >1) A garrison can not move in any way
> >2) A garrison can not study SFW
> >3) A garrison can not study absorb aura blast
> >
> >I see now who propagates the use of bugs.
> >
> >D.
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: James Frediani <ferpo@netdex.com>
> >To: Dragon Lord <ssifu@hotmail.com>; <g2-list@pbm.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 2:39 PM
> >Subject: Re:
> >
> >
> >> You are incorrect. The lore sheet specifically says "target", not
> >> noble. As for how much aura per garrison, well, try it yourself
> >> and find out. I am certain this is what your attacker/attackers
> >> did.
> >>
> >>
> >> ICLF
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dragon Lord <ssifu@hotmail.com>
> >> To: g2-list@pbm.com <g2-list@pbm.com>
> >> Date: Wednesday, April 21, 1999 5:20 AM
> >>
> >>
> >> >Hey everyone,
> >> >
> >> >I would like to ask a little question,
> >> >It seems it is possible to aura blast garrisons,
> >> >no matter how many troops are in it.
> >> >(we found out the hard way, we lost over 1500 troops in 3 garrisons)
> >> >
> >> >All I would like to know is how many aura do you need to destroy
> >> >a garrison.
> >> >It would make life so much easier, you just blast the provinces
> >> >around your enemy's castle and then you march in.
> >> >
> >> > Dragonlord
> >> >PS: I couldn't find anything in the rules about this so now I'm asking
> >> > that the guys who already found out give me the answer
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >______________________________________________________
> >> >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >