Re: Times 110

Richard Gabriel (silas75@hotmail.com)
Sun, 04 Apr 1999 15:03:29 PDT

>I figured that out ages ago. The question is: will anyone believe the
>accuser? I don't want to have people attacking me in the game because
>they think I cheat with the GM.

So every time somebody accuses you, or makes a disparaging comment, you
are going to reply? Even when the accusation has little chance of
affecting your reputation b/c the accusations are old news and nobody
really pays attention to them?

Sheesh Greg. People are gonna insult you (general "you") for the rest of
your life. That's part of life. Are you going to spend all your time
responding to meaningless accusations? The collusion factor already's
been plowed for all its worth. They stated their accusations; you stated
your case. What else is there to say except boring and pointless
repetition.

>Ah. I see. Well, I think you have a pretty sick double-standard that
>only encourages the attacker. And it's that double-standard that keeps
>me replying.

That's a flame, Greg. Once again, could you please control your
passive-aggressive tendencies and reply without hostility. If you don't
agree, say it. But don't resort to not-so-subtle flames.

>> Pick your battles, don't fight them all.
>
>I am upset any accusation of highly unethical behavior. If you were in
>my shoes, who knows what you would do?

I would state my case and ignore it after that. Why fight a childish
battle when its obvious there's not going to be a winner?

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links