Re: Times 110

Greg Lindahl (lindahl@pbm.com)
Sun, 4 Apr 1999 16:02:51 -0400 (EDT)

> >Er, I was just accused again of colluding with the GM. What would you
> >like me to do, say "thank you, maybe I have another?"
>
> How about: no response. How about just not replying b/c it's obvious
> that everytime they accuse of cheating they know you will shoot back.
>
> havn't you figured this out by now?

I figured that out ages ago. The question is: will anyone believe the
accuser? I don't want to have people attacking me in the game because
they think I cheat with the GM.

> >gm are too important to ignore. So why are you only flaming me? How
> >about the accuser?
>
> B/c the accuser knows what they are doing: playing you. You're the one
> that's unintentionally fueling it b/c you respond at every accusation
> even if the accusation has little power or credibility.

Ah. I see. Well, I think you have a pretty sick double-standard that
only encourages the attacker. And it's that double-standard that keeps
me replying.

> Pick your battles, don't fight them all.

I am upset any accusation of highly unethical behavior. If you were in
my shoes, who knows what you would do?

-- g

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links