Re: Times 110

Dominick Vansevenant (domme@dma.be)
Thu, 25 Mar 1999 11:36:47 +0100

I have to make a comment here, here are the first few lines of the detailed
report(rubble has been left out):

210:0::0:24:Combat between Heather~[2879] and Pwent Tibbledorf~[3643] on day
24

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-==--=-=-==--==--=-=-
=
backline(behind3):
210:0::0:24: k180.21 n=166 prt=5 nprt=0 al=1 bh=3 ms=1 ins=0 pris=0
sav=166 at=1 df=1

The at value is 1 !!

As you can see, the crossbowmen are behind the frontliners and they have
value 1 from the beginning, not when they got in the frontline later in the
battle.

Dominick

----- Original Message -----
From: Basil A. Daoust <daoust@ibm.net>
To: <jdgbobr@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu>
Cc: Rodgers, Robert <rrodgers@unex.ucla.edu>; 'Majestic'
<majestic@mail.dma.be>; <g2-list@pbm.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 4:37 AM
Subject: Re: Times 110

> >
> > It was a different bug, but it was similar. It involved crossbowmen in
> > wind. This one involves crossbowmen in the frontline. Both contradicted
> > the rules.
>
> My comment would be,
> anyone who puts ranged in the front line deserves to loose every battle
> they fight in. And IMHO ranged troops in the front line should fight
> with attack values and not ranged values anyway, otherwise why not have
> an attack value of ZERO.
>
> Basil
>
>

Main Index  |  Olympia  |  Arena  |  PBM FAQ  |  Links