Re: The Camaris Strait.

P.J.M. Beerepoot (mordred@ibm.net)
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 13:55:32 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Majestic: "Re: noble ID's"
Previous message: jasnic: "noble ID's"
Maybe in reply to: Justin Sellers: "The Camaris Strait."

Yes it would. In my view the seas should be open to all, for fishing,
tradin, exploring whatever. If a neutral party enters an area where naval
operations are under way and sails in harms way, that party does so at its
own risk and possibly peril.

Peter Beerepoot

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Neal <NGPhillippi@email.msn.com>
Aan: P.J.M. Beerepoot <mordred@ibm.net>; pwhiting@pacbell.net
<pwhiting@pacbell.net>; g2-list@pbm.com <g2-list@pbm.com>
Datum: zaterdag 6 maart 1999 8:51
Onderwerp: Re: The Camaris Strait.

>
>The forces or factions that wishes to control
>>the seas, or portions of it, to promote their belligerent policies should,
>>in my view, be regarded as outlaws.
>
> This would then also include the LoC for throwing up
>barriers in the sea to control its access.
> Neal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Next message: Majestic: "Re: noble ID's"
Previous message: jasnic: "noble ID's"
Maybe in reply to: Justin Sellers: "The Camaris Strait."

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links