Re: movement bug

Reinis (reinis@tkb.lv)
Thu, 16 Apr 1998 08:21:57 +0300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew Penney: "Re: movement bug"
Previous message: Mike Brand: "Re: We are under attack"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew Penney: "movement bug"
Next in thread: Andrew Penney: "Re: movement bug"

> > It seems this bug astonishes you,
> > but then you had to complain
> > when Khamath had his "Joyride" through our region.
> Of course your message does not address a more interesting issue
> therein
> revealed. Khamath's force was small and obviously on a limited mission
>
> (ghazi does not include the occupying of lands). Sir Codric's force is
>
> manifestly not small

Come on - you have double standarts - when ghazi has to be performed the
bug is OK, but when Sir Codric - at last - responded the bug is to
blame. There is something wrong with your attitude.

IMHO the bug must be converted to the rules since it's getting boring
when all stack moves only a couple of provinces per turn

reinis

Next message: Andrew Penney: "Re: movement bug"
Previous message: Mike Brand: "Re: We are under attack"
Maybe in reply to: Andrew Penney: "movement bug"
Next in thread: Andrew Penney: "Re: movement bug"

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links