>I assume this means you consider it hypocritical to complain only when one
>is personally inconvenienced by a bug (and it _is_ a bug, make no
>mistake). This is spurious logic at best. There is nothing wrong with
>picking one's moment to make a valid complaint. One cannot fight
>everyone's battles. Perhaps if we had _defended_ the movement bug in the
>past you would have a point.
>Of course your message does not address a more interesting issue therein
>revealed. Khamath's force was small and obviously on a limited mission
>(ghazi does not include the occupying of lands). Sir Codric's force is
>manifestly not small and completely out of scale as a response to
>Khamath's ghazi. I (and others I am sure) would love to know why you think
>Sir Codric's wholesale invasion a reasonable response to Khamath's limited
>raids. I would call it an excuse if it wasn't for the fact that Sir Codric
>has kept his usually uncivil tongue in his head lately.
>Aliestar Tanstagi
I would rather think that when you piss someone off, it is bad form to
complain
that you did not expect THAT sort of reaction. Personally, I would probably
attack in the same manner becaus if you are completely wiped out, then your
ghazi would stop (don't you think?).
Just a thought
Rodger