> jdgbobr@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu wrote:
> > Thank you, Jim. The hypocrisy of some in this list is amazing. I don't
> > remember any outcry when The Horselord was removing garrisons and
> > wandering to their heart's delight.
>
> My understanding is that the forrays by HARN were initiated to correct
> treaty violations by LotC. LotC has not stood by their committements, &
> it's not only
> HARN who has noticed this. I for one was glad when the Ghazi was
> announced.
That wasn't my understanding of the forays of Khamath. I thought they were
because of (perceived) insults and a desire to teach them a lesson.
>From the _Times_, issue 53:
--------
The Horselords are dismayed by the Lords of the Crown's continued
aggression and trouble making in South East Provinia. Their attitude
in negotiations with the Harn Alliance and other nations has been
arrogant and high handed. They threaten force almost immediately and
we have decided there is no reason for us to ignore this any longer.
The Lords are a destabilising force in the area and might do well to
to understand their proper place. The Horselords have therefore decided
to declare the area claimed by the Lords of the Crown as "ghazi".
----------
Nothing about treaty violations in that declaration.
> Yes, I know, Plato is the evil empire, the reincarnation of the AOO
> (does _anyone_ remember who fought the AOO in G1? Poor Desdinova is
> rolling over in her grave), & everything else bad. No doubt some web
> page has nominated Captain Arrr for the anti-christ award.
I wasn't referring to you or PLATO in the above hypocrisy accusation. I
don't where the above came from. ???
> Just because we say someone is bad, doesn't mean they're good.
Again, ???.
Yours,
--Cendage
Eridanus
> -pedagogically,
> Captain Arrr
>