No, you're fond of being confused.
> For the record, I have no problems with pseudonyms per se. I've been to a
> good number of places on the Internet, and in some of those places
> nicknames or handles are practically manditory (say, on IRC, or on servers
> set up for RTS games, to name two examples). In those places, I've used
> nicknames, and haven't objected to the practice.
Nicknames on IRC and nicknames in a game are completely different.
> For that matter, I really
> have no problem with you being known as Oleg. What I don't recognize is
> that Oleg is somehow a seperate entity than Greg, with seperate knowledge
> and seperate motives; I find that quite artifical,
But I never said that; you made it up.
If you aren't going to talk _with_ people, don't bother to post.
> Like I said, if people want to roleplay, go ahead. Just don't expect me to
> participate.
And if the other players want to wipe you out solely because you don't
address them by the names they like, I'd cheer.
> >You don't think Atnerks is going to create the Brian artifact, do you?
>
> Perhaps not, but I certainly wouldn't object to it.
Congratulations on missing the point. Atnerks so far has only created
artifacts for colorful characters in the game. He wouldn't create one
named Greg because Oleg is well-known for his loud mouth.
-- greg (not Oleg)