> I recommended to Rich that the money to be made from Trade should be
> adjusted until it's equal to the money to be made from land holding.
> That's because I like good game designs, not because I'm losing.
If land holding would have the same income as trade, then castle holders
would be at an advantage, because, as even you have said, its a much more low
maintenance investment that trade.
Also, trade = land holding is your definition of a good game design, it
certainly isn't mine.
Best Regards,
--
Rogerio