Re: G2 enhancements

Rodger Coghlan (grrc@ntwrks.com)
Mon, 19 Jun 1978 08:50:55 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrew Penney: "Dammed Savages"
Previous message: Mark Hendrickson: "Re: G2 enhancements"
In reply to: Al Gassner: "Items, Items, Items..."
Next in thread: Al Gassner: "Re: Items, Items, Items..."

>At 13:36 -0700 8/21/97, Ken Scott wrote:
>>If there are 200+ players in Game 2, then why don't we just have a vote on
>>any changes to the game. It should be very hard to get a rule change to
>>pass, 3/4 of the players, but if we continually enchance Game 2, we may
>>never need a Game 3.

Jeez, 200+ players trying to vote on rules -- give me a break. I joined this
game for the rules I am playing by; Why should I care what 200 other people
want or decide. I am sorry I even brought up the cache,hide,store idea; I've
learned my lesson.

voting on the rules -- heh,heh you gotta be kidding me.

Gregory

Next message: Andrew Penney: "Dammed Savages"
Previous message: Mark Hendrickson: "Re: G2 enhancements"
In reply to: Al Gassner: "Items, Items, Items..."
Next in thread: Al Gassner: "Re: Items, Items, Items..."

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links